Francuski filosof Žak Derida je voleo da govori o budućnosti koja stiže a koju ne možemo predvideti (videti prilog od 21.04.).To je za njega bila i jedina prava budućnost - "ono nadolazeće" ( "a venir").Šta je onda nada? Možda ono što želimo da se dogodi, da se "ostvari",ono u čega verujemo.
Nemački religiozni mislilac, J.Moltman, ovako rezonuje:"Život vere ovisi o snazi nade.Ljudski razum nadom stječe budućnost svih čula.Ako je to istina,tad je bijeda nevjere u gubitku nade, a ljudski razum postaje nerazumnim kad se više nema čemu nadati"
P.S.Izvinjavam se čitaocima bloga (ako ima i takvih) za odsustvo od oko 2 meseca(krečio sam sobu,ulazio u neka privatna razmišljanja i sl.).Idemo dalje)!
"On analysing the question closely,we find that nature of hope is very hard to define.I will take two examples: to hope for the recovery from illness or for the conversion of a person dear to us,and to hope for the liberation of one's oppressed country.The hope here is for something which,according to the order of nature,does not depend upon us /it is absolutely outside the zone where stoicism can be practised/.At the root of the hope is the consciousness of a state of things which invites us to despair /illness,damnation,etc./.To hope is to put one's trust in reality,to assert that it contains the means of triumphing over this danger; and here it can be seen that the correlative of hope is not fear,far from it,but the act of making the worst of things, a sort of pessimistic fatalism whish assumes the impotence of reality or which will not grant that it can take account of something even if it not just our good,but rather,as we think, a good in the absolute sense of the word."/ G.Marcel,"Being And Having"/
